We are restoring the requested view from its saved state. Your account and work remain unchanged while you wait.
Back to the track — Accounts Payable Accountant
Supplier statement is 332,900.00 and subledger 318,400.00, a 14,500.00 difference. Team proposes crediting payables to agree. But statement includes a 23,000.00 invoice not received by AP, while ledger includes an 8,500.00 payment not yet reflected by supplier. Prove direction and close difference from both events.
The subledger shows what your entity recorded; supplier statement shows what supplier recorded on your account. Agreement strengthens completeness and difference opens investigation; neither alone proves truth. Ledger may be 318,400.00 while statement is 332,900.00, a 14,500.00 difference. That is not necessarily one missing journal. It may contain a 9,200.00 invoice supplier recorded but AP did not receive and a 5,300.00 payment your entity recorded but supplier did not allocate. Posting 14,500.00 credit to agree balances duplicates invoice and hides payment. Good reconciliation opens the difference into directions and documents, then decides what each item needs.
Before calculation, align sign meaning. Supplier may show amounts owed as debit while your ledger shows liability as credit. Copying signs may lead to addition instead of subtraction. Cover states each perspective, currency, cut-off date and opening and closing balances. If supplier statement is in contract currency while ledger is SAR, separate document difference from translation; do not make exchange movement look like a missing invoice. Match entity and branch too. A group statement does not match one company's account without documented split. Fixing boundaries is the cheapest step and avoids hours spent on incomparable populations.
Build document populations from both sides: invoice, note or payment number, date, net, tax, gross, currency, reference and state. Start one-to-one; use aggregation only when evidence shows supplier grouped payments or system split one document. Do not match 23,000.00 to two 11,500.00 invoices merely because totals agree; verify references and dates. Use fuzzy number matching cautiously because a supplier may omit dash or leading zero. Population yields clear classes: both sides, supplier only, your books only, different amount, different allocation or unresolved identity. Total alone provides none of these decisions.
An item on supplier side only is not automatically a missing liability. It may be an invoice in transit, rejected invoice supplier did not reverse, another entity's document, duplicate, or actual supply needing accrual. Obtain copy and pass identity, PO, receipt, tax and duplicate checks before posting. If event belongs to period but invoice is absent, accounting may already hold an uninvoiced-receipt accrual; later invoice clears chain rather than creates new cost. Posting supplier statement difference directly because it is higher turns a completeness tool into an untested journal source.
The treatment starts from these documents. Follow the numbers to identify recognition date, amount, counterparty, reference and approval evidence before preparing the entry.
Facts and supporting evidence
A valid 23,000.00 service invoice appears on statement but not ledger; receipt, purpose and invoice are supported, and search confirms no prior accrual.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Service expense | 20,000.00 | |
| Input VAT | 3,000.00 | |
| Accounts payable | 23,000.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 23,000.00 | 23,000.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
Post invoice from source after checking accruals so cost is not duplicated.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: A valid 23,000.00 service invoice appears on statement but not ledger; receipt, purpose and invoice are supported, and search confirms no prior accrual. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Supplier statement bridge, Supplier open-item register explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the purchase order, receipt evidence, tax invoice and payment approval, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Service expense, Input VAT) and the credit side (Accounts payable). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 23,000.00 and total credits 23,000.00. Debit detail: Service expense for 20,000.00; Input VAT for 3,000.00. Credit detail: Accounts payable for 23,000.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the payables control account, supplier subledger and supplier statement. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
Reconciliation retains supplier ID, statement date, page count, opening/closing balance and ledger cut-off. Each reconciling item has direction, type, evidence, owner, age, state and action. System prevents direct plug from reconciliation screen and closes only when source event links and match reruns.
Reconcile three supplier statements from balance to document, opening each variance with direction, cause, evidence, owner and closure action.
Work output: A workbook
These are yours once downloaded, and need no account. Fill them with your own figures and keep them in your portfolio.
Enter balances and 14,500.00 explained, then prove in workpaper net comprises 23,000.00 and 8,500.00 in opposite directions.
A 14,500.00 difference decomposes into two opposing events.
What you haveStatement 332,900.00; ledger 318,400.00.
The arithmetic in this case runs in the tool itself, which is open to you any time with your own figures.
Log unproved balance completeness, item direction, strongest evidence and source action that closes it.
This is not sent anywhere and not stored here. Write it down for yourself — in the workpaper you downloaded, or on paper.
Fix a complete statement and cut-off ledger, then open variance into directed items. Zero is evidence result, not reconciliation journal.
Statement exceeds ledger by 14,500.00 due to 23,000.00 invoice and 8,500.00 payment. Explain direction and closure.
Answer every question. Getting them all right records this lesson; you may retry as often as you need.
Reading alone records nothing.
The complete applied walkthrough is available below while the recording is prepared.
I place 332,900.00 statement and 318,400.00 ledger, refuse one 14,500.00 line, add 23,000.00 invoice one way and 8,500.00 payment opposite, then close each with evidence so zero becomes result.
An item on your books only may be payment in transit, unallocated credit note, internal journal, supplier-cancelled invoice or posting error. Each direction closes differently. Payment needs bank reference, value date and amount sent for supplier allocation. Credit note needs copy and invoice link. Manual journal needs reason and authority and is not sent as commercial document. If supplier did not receive cash, a bank instruction screenshot does not close it; follow debit, rejection and return state. Ledger presence proves recording, not value reaching supplier account.
A supplier may resend an old invoice because it appears unpaid, while entity actually paid but reference was missing or allocated elsewhere. AP relying only on ledger may find invoice open and pay again; relying only on statement can do same. Reconciliation places payment and invoices in one chain and asks supplier to correct allocation before new cash leaves. Large or critical suppliers are reconciled periodically and before significant runs, not annually. Unexplained difference need not stop the supplier forever, but decision identifies safe invoices and amount exposed to duplication.
Supplier communication sends a list, not gross difference. Say: 'Statement at 30/09/2026 shows SI-9032 for 9,200.00 absent from our records; send copy and PO. Payment PAY-771 for 5,300.00 debited on 28/09/2026 is absent from your statement; bank reference attached.' This gives two clear actions. Do not send full ledger exposing unrelated activity or accept 'we will adjust next month' as closure. Item remains awaiting supplier and is reperformed on next statement. A fact dispute escalates to procurement or contract owner, not a variance journal.
At close, cover ties both balances, open items and assessed effects. Invoice in transit may need accrual or posting, payment in transit may be a timing reconciling item, missing credit note may reduce liability and input VAT, and dispute may need escalation or disclosure under policy and materiality. Do not call something timing without expected date; timing that does not reverse next cycle becomes another cause. Each item retains first-seen date because today's SAR 14,500.00 may look normal, but persistence across three periods signals an unperformed action or wrong explanation.
Quality metrics go beyond statements received. Measure supplier coverage, percentage reconciled to reperformable zero, unexplained value, item age, response time and recurrence after closure. A supplier sending no statement is not therefore clean; use alternative confirmation or movement analysis based on risk. Reconciliation held in a personal file without review does not protect payment. Assign owner, frequency and selection criteria, retaining used version. Metrics prioritise population; they do not make an unexplained difference acceptable because it is below management target.
A completed reconciliation lets another person start from locked supplier statement and ledger, reperform difference, open into documents, see direction, cause, owner, evidence and action, and reach 0.00 without basket journal. A genuine dispute remains visible with effect and authorised decision rather than forced to zero. Honest zero preserves history and is reperformable; manufactured zero needs its preparer to explain where remainder was hidden. Before payment and close, choose the first even if report is longer, because length costs less than duplicate payment or unrecorded liability.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: Expense 20,000.00 and VAT 3,000.00 are missing while difference account is unexplained. Do not close until the journal agrees with payables ageing, input VAT and cash and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.
Facts and supporting evidence
An 8,500.00 payment cleared bank and ledger but is not yet on supplier statement.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts payable | 8,500.00 | |
| Bank | 8,500.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 8,500.00 | 8,500.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
No extra reconciliation journal; item remains timing difference with bank evidence and next-statement follow-up.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: An 8,500.00 payment cleared bank and ledger but is not yet on supplier statement. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Supplier statement bridge, Supplier open-item register explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the purchase order, receipt evidence, tax invoice and payment approval, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Accounts payable) and the credit side (Bank). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 8,500.00 and total credits 8,500.00. Debit detail: Accounts payable for 8,500.00. Credit detail: Bank for 8,500.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the payables control account, supplier subledger and supplier statement. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: Bank and payable are overstated 8,500.00 and invoice may be repaid. Do not close until the journal agrees with payables ageing, input VAT and cash and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.
Facts and supporting evidence
An 11,500.00 credit note appears on statement but not ledger and links to original invoice.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts payable | 11,500.00 | |
| Service expense | 10,000.00 | |
| Input VAT | 1,500.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 11,500.00 | 11,500.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
Correction follows original nature and treatment and links to it.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: An 11,500.00 credit note appears on statement but not ledger and links to original invoice. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Supplier statement bridge, Supplier open-item register explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the purchase order, receipt evidence, tax invoice and payment approval, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Accounts payable) and the credit side (Service expense, Input VAT). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 11,500.00 and total credits 11,500.00. Debit detail: Accounts payable for 11,500.00. Credit detail: Service expense for 10,000.00; Input VAT for 1,500.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the payables control account, supplier subledger and supplier statement. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: Expense over 10,000.00, VAT over 1,500.00 and income over 11,500.00. Do not close until the journal agrees with payables ageing, input VAT and cash and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.
Facts and supporting evidence
A duplicate 46,000.00 ledger invoice appears only once on supplier statement.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts payable | 46,000.00 | |
| Service expense | 40,000.00 | |
| Input VAT | 6,000.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 46,000.00 | 46,000.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
Reversing duplicate fixes cause and retains original.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: A duplicate 46,000.00 ledger invoice appears only once on supplier statement. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Supplier statement bridge, Supplier open-item register explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the purchase order, receipt evidence, tax invoice and payment approval, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Accounts payable) and the credit side (Service expense, Input VAT). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 46,000.00 and total credits 46,000.00. Debit detail: Accounts payable for 46,000.00. Credit detail: Service expense for 40,000.00; Input VAT for 6,000.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the payables control account, supplier subledger and supplier statement. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: 46,000.00 leaves while expense and VAT remain duplicated. Do not close until the journal agrees with payables ageing, input VAT and cash and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.