We are restoring the requested view from its saved state. Your account and work remain unchanged while you wait.
Back to the track — Financial Accountant
On the evening of 31/08/2026 the factory electricity invoice has not arrived, but the meter reading, operations log and contract tariff prove service estimated at 18,750.00. The same file contains an insurance policy paid on 01/08/2026 for 120,000.00 covering twelve months. If the accountant waits for the invoice, August omits expense and liability; if the policy is expensed in full, August carries eleven months whose benefit has not passed. The task is not moving profit toward a comfortable number but writing two separate stories: a service occurred without an invoice and is accrued; cash was paid for future benefit and remains an asset before being consumed by its pattern. After close, an electricity invoice for 25,200.00 arrives against a prior 24,000.00 estimate; the old liability is cleared and only the 1,200.00 variance is recorded, then that variance becomes evidence about estimate quality rather than an excuse to repeat expense.
At the end of August, the accountant does not first ask when cash moved. The first question is which services the company consumed by 31 August and which benefits still belong to later months. An electricity invoice may arrive in September after the factory ran throughout August, while a full year of insurance may be paid on one day before most months of cover have passed. If expense is made equal to payment, August absorbs costs that do not belong to it and misses costs that do. Accruals and prepayments repair that timing difference: an accrual adds a consumed but unbilled service to the period; a prepayment keeps an unconsumed paid benefit out of the period.
This is not an exercise in moving profit toward a preferred number. The starting point is a specific economic event rather than a target result: maintenance was performed, a building was occupied, insurance cover was provided, or a service has not started at all. Period boundaries, evidence and estimation follow. A reviewer must be able to reconstruct the decision from independent evidence such as a contract, completed work order, meter reading, time sheet, receipt note or coverage schedule. The entry is the output of that path, not its source. A team that starts with ‘we need more expense to make the ratio look reasonable’ has left accrual accounting and begun manufacturing an unsupported result.
The quickest reliable method is to draw three dates: service start, close date, and service end or invoice date. If the supplier started before close and completed a provable part, that completed part belongs to the period even if the invoice remains outside the system. If the contract starts after close, no expense or liability arises merely because a contract was signed or a purchase order issued; an unperformed reciprocal promise is not a consumed service. Between those cases, continuing service is measured using an appropriate unit: days of cover, labour hours, units consumed or documented completion milestones. The timeline prevents the payment date from swallowing the recognition question.
An accrual joins two sides that must not be separated: expense reflects what was consumed and a liability reflects what the company now owes. Expense without a liability understates credit balances and liabilities; a liability without the expense moves the effect into an account that does not describe why the debt exists. For August electricity estimated at 18,750.00, the entry debits electricity expense and credits accrued expenses. Trade payables is used only under the system policy when an actual supplier invoice is recorded; the pre-invoice accrual stays in an account that declares its temporary nature and can be cleared cleanly later.
The treatment starts from these documents. Follow the numbers to identify recognition date, amount, counterparty, reference and approval evidence before preparing the entry.
Facts and supporting evidence
Case one — August electricity was consumed but not invoiced. The meter reading, contract tariff and documented adjustment produce 18,750.00.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Electricity expense — 620400 | 18,750.00 | |
| Accrued expenses — 210300 | 18,750.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 18,750.00 | 18,750.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
The service occurred before cut-off, so August carries the expense even when cash and invoice remain in September. The liability is not a free guess: the memo ties quantity, rate and adjustment to evidence. When the invoice arrives, accrued expenses are cleared and only the estimate variance reaches expense; the entry is not turned into a cash story that never happened.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: Case one — August electricity was consumed but not invoiced. The meter reading, contract tariff and documented adjustment produce 18,750.00. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Accrual evidence memo, Prepayment roll-forward explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the event source, cut-off memo and journal approval, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Electricity expense — 620400) and the credit side (Accrued expenses — 210300). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 18,750.00 and total credits 18,750.00. Debit detail: Electricity expense — 620400 for 18,750.00. Credit detail: Accrued expenses — 210300 for 18,750.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the general ledger, subledger and related reconciliation. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
In an ERP, accrual quality begins with the population rather than the posting screen: open service purchase orders, service-entry records, readings, recurring contracts, and blocked or subsequent invoices. A purchase order does not mean service was performed, and no invoice does not mean no expense exists. Tie each accrual memo to supplier, contract, cost centre and period, and use a clear document type and reversal policy so the later invoice can match and clear the liability instead of repeating it. Prepayments need a subledger schedule agreeing to the general ledger: opening, additions, expense, cancellations and closing by contract. If the system generates periodic entries, review start date, end date, benefit pattern and accounts before the run, then reconcile the schedule total to the ledger. Automation repeats configuration accurately; when configuration is wrong, it repeats the error accurately too.
Start on the accrual memo sheet: record the service event, cut-off evidence, estimate method and owner, then let the formula calculate 18,750.00. On the prepayment sheet, roll every contract from opening to closing and test whether benefit is even before accepting a monthly division. In the subsequent-invoice test, clear 24,000.00, recognise a 25,200.00 payable and let the sheet calculate the 1,200.00 variance. Finally, never mark a control complete without a reference: close requires a complete population, reproducible memos, a schedule agreeing to the ledger, and variances with an owner and due date.
Work output: A workbook
These are yours once downloaded, and need no account. Fill them with your own figures and keep them in your portfolio.
Post August's electricity accrual: debit electricity expense 18,750.00 and credit accrued expenses 18,750.00. Observe that the entry balances and profit falls without changing cash.
August close in eight decisions: begin with event and cut-off, choose the estimate and entry, test the prepayment, then reach the later invoice and close condition.
What you haveA maintenance purchase order is 75,000.00, and the site record proves work will begin in September.
The arithmetic in this case runs in the tool itself, which is open to you any time with your own figures.
For each error write: the event that did or did not occur, cut-off date, evidence available, accounts selected, period carrying expense, balance left after invoice or reversal, then the control that would have found it: population completeness, reproducible memo, prepayment roll-forward, or subsequent-invoice back-test. Do not stop at 'wrong timing'; name the clock followed instead of the event clock.
This is not sent anywhere and not stored here. Write it down for yourself — in the workpaper you downloaded, or on paper.
An accrual recognises expense and liability when service is performed before cut-off without an invoice, provided the population is complete and the memo ties event, evidence and a reproducible estimate method. A purchase order alone does not prove service. A prepayment begins as an asset when payment precedes benefit consumption, then becomes expense by that pattern; closing equals opening plus payments less period expense and must agree to the ledger. When an invoice follows an earlier accrual, the full invoice becomes payable, the accrual is cleared, and expense carries only the estimate variance. Back-testing is not record clean-up but a learning control that reveals bias and changes the next method. A balanced entry remains wrong when it follows the cash clock instead of the event, calls a purchase order service, or repeats expense. A real close needs a complete population, reproducible memos, reconciled schedules, explained variances, and exceptions with owners and dates.
Answer every question. Getting them all right records this lesson; you may retry as often as you need.
Reading alone records nothing.
The complete applied walkthrough is available below while the recording is prepared.
At August close we have two clocks, not one. Electricity is consumed now, while invoice and cash arrive in September. Begin with the event: meter reading, operations log and contract tariff produce eighteen thousand seven hundred and fifty. Debit electricity expense and credit accrued expenses. Notice: no cash. In the same file, one hundred and twenty thousand was paid for a twelve-month policy. Cash left, but all benefit was not consumed; record a prepaid asset, then only ten thousand each month while benefit is even. After close a twenty-five-thousand-two-hundred invoice arrives against a twenty-four-thousand accrual. Do not record the whole invoice in expense again: clear the accrual, recognise the supplier payable and record only the one-thousand-two-hundred variance. Then ask why the estimate missed and whether bias repeats. The rule joining all three cases is this: cash proves payment, the event determines the period, evidence measures the amount, and back-testing stops error becoming habit.
The final amount may be unknown on 31 August, but uncertainty does not mean the absence of a basis. The best available evidence is selected and written down: a reading through day 25 plus six estimated days, approved unbilled hours, a contract rate multiplied by evidenced completion, or a September invoice that reveals an August service. A reviewer should see the source figure, completion method and estimate owner. When the range is wide, history may challenge the estimate without replacing current evidence. The best supportable estimate today is stronger than a superficially precise number with no source.
A later invoice is not merely a payment document; it is a back-test of estimate quality. If the August accrual was 24,000.00 and the invoice for the same service arrives at 25,200.00, the 1,200.00 difference needs explanation and recognition in the period allowed by close policy, while the prior accrual is cleared. Posting the entire invoice as new expense and leaving the accrual open records the service twice: once as estimate and once as invoice. The accrual register therefore carries entry number, supplier, estimate basis, expected invoice date, reversal or matching status and final variance. An account without a clearance path turns from an estimate into an ageing balance.
When a company pays 120,000.00 for insurance cover from 1 September to the following 31 August, it does not receive twelve months of service on payment day; it receives a right to future cover. The payment is therefore recorded as a prepaid-insurance asset. At the end of September, one month has passed, so 10,000.00 is charged to insurance expense and 110,000.00 remains an asset. That balance is not a holding account awaiting management's decision. It is a consumption schedule with a start, end, method and monthly effect, and each month must agree to the contract and covered period.
Not every prepayment is straight-line. Rent may follow occupancy days, a licence may begin on activation, a maintenance contract may be consumed through specified visits, and advertising may be used when campaigns run rather than when an order is signed. The method follows the benefit pattern, not spreadsheet convenience. Straight-line is appropriate when consumption really is even, but that reason should be written rather than dividing by months automatically. Recoverable tax and other components must also be separated according to their evidence; the gross contract value is not always the expense base.
| State at close | Treatment | Decisive evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Service consumed, not invoiced | Expense and accrued liability | Performance evidence and estimate basis |
| Service paid, not consumed | Prepayment asset | Contract and future benefit period |
| Service consumed and invoiced | Normal supplier posting or accrual match | Invoice and receipt or acceptance |
| No performance or consumption | No entry | Purchase order alone is insufficient |
Some accruals are reversed on the first day of the next month so the invoice can follow its normal path without duplication. That is useful when the invoice is expected promptly and a control links the reversal to it. It is not a rule for every adjustment: a prepayment is not reversed in full but consumed periodically, while an accrual whose invoice will not arrive soon may need direct matching rather than a reversal that understates early next-month costs. The team must see accrual, reversal and invoice as one chain. A reversal without the original entry identifier, or an invoice that does not test the open balance, breaks that chain and permits duplication.
A sound close does not end when entries post; it ends when population completeness is supported. Contract and prepayment registers are extracted, service start and end dates reviewed, purchase orders and uninvoiced receipts examined, and departments asked about completed services whose bills have not arrived. Prior-month balances are then matched: what cleared, what remains, and what returned without cause? Those procedures expose opposite errors: understated expense from an absent invoice and overstated expense from a future benefit charged immediately. Reviewing one side does not prove completeness of the other.
An accrual workpaper closes when every amount is tied to a performed service, period, estimate basis, owner and clearance date, after which the later invoice is back-tested and the variance explained. A prepayment workpaper closes when opening balance agrees to the ledger, supported additions are included, period consumption follows the benefit pattern, and closing balance agrees to remaining contracts. In both cases the trial balance is rerun and the income statement and balance sheet are reviewed: expense belongs to the period, while the asset or liability describes what remains at close. Zero alone does not close the paper; the evidence chain does.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: The bank reconciliation is out by 18,750.00 and supplier ageing is understated, then real payment is posted again in September unless the fictional entry is found. Do not close until the journal agrees with the trial balance and financial-statement lines and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.
Facts and supporting evidence
Case two — an insurance policy of 120,000.00 was paid on 01/08/2026 and covers the factory evenly through 31/07/2027.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Prepaid insurance — 120510 | 120,000.00 | |
| Cash at banks — 110100 | 120,000.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 120,000.00 | 120,000.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
Payment proves cash left, not that twelve months of benefit were consumed in one day. The asset begins at 120,000.00, August then carries 10,000.00 of insurance expense and the schedule closes at 110,000.00. Correct treatment needs both the payment and monthly release entries; this example isolates the payment moment so the distinction stays visible.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: Case two — an insurance policy of 120,000.00 was paid on 01/08/2026 and covers the factory evenly through 31/07/2027. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Accrual evidence memo, Prepayment roll-forward explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the event source, cut-off memo and journal approval, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Prepaid insurance — 120510) and the credit side (Cash at banks — 110100). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 120,000.00 and total credits 120,000.00. Debit detail: Prepaid insurance — 120510 for 120,000.00. Credit detail: Cash at banks — 110100 for 120,000.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the general ledger, subledger and related reconciliation. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: August profit is understated by 110,000.00 beyond its share and an equal asset is hidden, while later covered months show no insurance expense. Do not close until the journal agrees with the trial balance and financial-statement lines and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.
Facts and supporting evidence
Case three — a September invoice for 25,200.00 arrives after August's 24,000.00 accrual. The 1,200.00 variance is supported by the final reading.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Accrued expenses — 210300 | 24,000.00 | |
| Electricity expense — 620400 | 1,200.00 | |
| Trade payables — 210100 | 25,200.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 25,200.00 | 25,200.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
The invoice creates a supplier payable for the full 25,200.00, but not fresh expense for the same figure because August already carried 24,000.00. The estimated liability is cleared and expense receives only the 1,200.00 variance. The variance rate and materiality threshold are then compared with this supplier's history to decide whether the estimate method changes.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: Case three — a September invoice for 25,200.00 arrives after August's 24,000.00 accrual. The 1,200.00 variance is supported by the final reading. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Accrual evidence memo, Prepayment roll-forward explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the event source, cut-off memo and journal approval, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Accrued expenses — 210300, Electricity expense — 620400) and the credit side (Trade payables — 210100). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 25,200.00 and total credits 25,200.00. Debit detail: Accrued expenses — 210300 for 24,000.00; Electricity expense — 620400 for 1,200.00. Credit detail: Trade payables — 210100 for 25,200.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the general ledger, subledger and related reconciliation. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: Liabilities and expense are overstated by 24,000.00, September looks worse than reality, and estimate accuracy is never tested. Do not close until the journal agrees with the trial balance and financial-statement lines and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.
Facts and supporting evidence
Case four — a 75,000.00 maintenance accrual was recorded from a purchase order, then the site record proves work had not begun by 31/08/2026. The entry must be reversed.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Accrued expenses — 210300 | 75,000.00 | |
| Maintenance expense — 620300 | 75,000.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 75,000.00 | 75,000.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
A purchase order is a potential operating commitment, not evidence that the entity received service. Because no event occurred by cut-off, there is no expense or accounting liability. The correction reverses the whole entry with the site-record reference; it does not wait for a zero invoice or purchase-order cancellation before restoring August's true story.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: Case four — a 75,000.00 maintenance accrual was recorded from a purchase order, then the site record proves work had not begun by 31/08/2026. The entry must be reversed. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Accrual evidence memo, Prepayment roll-forward explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the event source, cut-off memo and journal approval, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Accrued expenses — 210300) and the credit side (Maintenance expense — 620300). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 75,000.00 and total credits 75,000.00. Debit detail: Accrued expenses — 210300 for 75,000.00. Credit detail: Maintenance expense — 620300 for 75,000.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the general ledger, subledger and related reconciliation. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: Profit falls and liabilities rise by 75,000.00, and management could shift monthly results by selecting unperformed orders and reversing them later. Do not close until the journal agrees with the trial balance and financial-statement lines and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.
The ledger accepts this entry
'August's electricity invoice has not arrived by close, and an annual insurance policy was paid on the first day. How do you evidence each case, and what do you do when the later invoice differs from the accrual?'