We are restoring the requested view from its saved state. Your account and work remain unchanged while you wait.
Back to the track — Zakat and Corporate Tax Specialist
A Saudi company with a Hijri hawl closed with a book loss of SAR 260,000.00 but has funding sources of 7,100,000.00, supported deductions of 5,100,000.00 and disallowed expenses of 60,000.00. The manager wants to apply a rate to the loss and close zakat at zero. Prove scope, build the base and show why the result becomes 1,800,000.00 and zakat 45,000.00.
The first failure in a zakat workpaper is starting with a number before identifying the payer. Examine legal form, Saudi, GCC and non-Saudi ownership, residence, activity, period, and whether the payer maintains statutory accounts or follows a deemed route. A mixed company may not follow one treatment for its whole ownership; the non-Saudi share may enter corporate income tax while the qualifying share enters zakat. Prepare a scope memo and obtain responsible approval before opening the computation. Retain commercial registration, ownership chart and changes, activity start date, year end and registration number. If a partner changed mid-year, do not copy last year's position; escalate the fact and document the effective treatment. Scope is not a cover sheet. It selects the regulation, return, rate and deadline.
After scope, separate accounting profit from the zakat base. The income statement answers what result the entity generated during the period. The zakat base gathers funding sources and balance-sheet items, deducts assets subject to regulatory conditions, and incorporates the adjusted activity result and base limits. An entity may report an accounting loss of SAR 260,000.00 while still holding equity and financing used in the activity, producing a base of 1,800,000.00. Multiplying a rate by the loss gives zero but says nothing about funds held by the business. The reverse also applies: high profit is not automatically the entire base. Begin with a locked trial balance and approved statements, then construct explicit bridge columns instead of replacing zakat logic with the profit-before-zakat line.
The additions side does not mean adding revenue again. It is a funding-source register linking capital, retained earnings and qualifying liabilities and provisions to account, movement, holding period and treatment. A loan appearing as non-current is not enough; test the conditions and amount included under the effective text. A balance called a provision is not enough either; distinguish an end-of-service provision from an equity reserve and a short-term liability. Take the balance from the trial balance, then bridge opening, additions, use, transfers and closing. If the teaching case produces additions of SAR 7,100,000.00, the reviewer must be able to open every component and return to account, contract and classification decision rather than merely agreeing the total to a prior file.
The deductions side is not a list of everything that looks non-current. The regulations attach conditions to each class, potentially involving ownership, classification, holding period, financing source and use. The register therefore carries asset description, account, acquisition date, movement, net amount, evidence, treatment and article. In the example, qualifying fixed assets of SAR 4,600,000.00 and an eligible investment of 500,000.00 give deductions of 5,100,000.00. Another asset of 300,000.00 without complete support remains in a held column; it is not forced into deductions to make the base look finished. Holding an item is a control that stops an unsupported opinion becoming a filed position. When evidence is completed, update the treatment and version with a visible trail rather than silently editing the cell.
The treatment starts from these documents. Follow the numbers to identify recognition date, amount, counterparty, reference and approval evidence before preparing the entry.
Facts and supporting evidence
A 1,800,000.00 base was approved for a Hijri hawl at 2.5%, producing zakat of 45,000.00.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Zakat expense | 45,000.00 | |
| Zakat payable | 45,000.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 45,000.00 | 45,000.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
The journal follows the approved base rather than book loss.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: A 1,800,000.00 base was approved for a Hijri hawl at 2.5%, producing zakat of 45,000.00. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Payer scope memo, Zakat base bridge explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the ownership structure, scope memo, accounts and effective regulation, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Zakat expense) and the credit side (Zakat payable). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 45,000.00 and total credits 45,000.00. Debit detail: Zakat expense for 45,000.00. Credit detail: Zakat payable for 45,000.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the base bridge, zakat and tax ledgers and item references. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: Liability is understated 38,500.00 and funding-source logic disappears. Do not close until the journal agrees with the base, provision, return or assessment file and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.
ERP links the account map to regulation release and effective period, retaining each account state, additions, deductions and adjusted result. It does not alter books to match the base; it retains a dated reconciliation layer, locked release and reference for each exception.
Prove payer scope, map accounts and bridge 7,100,000.00 sources, 5,100,000.00 deductions and 200,000.00 adjusted loss to a 1,800,000.00 base.
Work output: A workbook
These are yours once downloaded, and need no account. Fill them with your own figures and keep them in your portfolio.
Use the tool after determining treatments, then reperform its output independently.
Build the base from proven scope to reconcilable journal and payment.
What you haveOwnership chart is stale.
The arithmetic in this case runs in the tool itself, which is open to you any time with your own figures.
Log the account, treatment, source or period that does not return to evidence, then correct scope, bridge and journal.
This is not sent anywhere and not stored here. Write it down for yourself — in the workpaper you downloaded, or on paper.
The zakat base begins with payer scope and a complete account map, adds funding sources, deducts qualifying assets and incorporates adjusted activity result and regulatory limits. Book profit or loss is not the base, and an account name does not establish treatment. The 2.5% rate belongs to a Hijri hawl; a different year is calculated by days under effective text. The file closes when every riyal returns to account, evidence, article and period, and journal and payment agree to the approved release.
How do you explain zakat of 45,000.00 in a year with an accounting loss of 260,000.00?
Answer every question. Getting them all right records this lesson; you may retry as often as you need.
Reading alone records nothing.
The complete applied walkthrough is available below while the recording is prepared.
The 260,000.00 loss is not the zakat base. Prove scope first, then add 7,100,000.00 funding sources, deduct 5,100,000.00 qualifying assets and incorporate the 200,000.00 adjusted loss to reach 1,800,000.00. Because the year is a Hijri hawl, 2.5% produces 45,000.00. For a different year, open the article and calculate by days. Then link journal and payment to the same release. The final arithmetic is simple; the work is opening every addition and deduction back to account, treatment and evidence.
The activity result enters after adjustment, not in its raw book form. Start with financial-statement profit or loss and maintain a separate adjustment register for items allowed or disallowed by the regulations. A loss of 260,000.00 with a disallowed expense of 60,000.00 becomes an adjusted loss of 200,000.00 and enters the bridge at that amount. Do not label every difference permanent or temporary before understanding its cause, and do not mix the zakat bridge with the deferred-tax register used for income tax. The adjusted result may also operate within minimum or maximum base rules set by the effective text; do not invent a universal rule from one example. A strong paper displays the base before a limit, the limit used, authority and base after the limit, separating arithmetic from jurisdictional judgement.
A rate must not be stored apart from its year. The effective Zakat Implementing Regulations set 2.5% for a Hijri hawl; when the fiscal year differs from the Hijri year, the rate is calculated by days under the statutory formula. Fixing 2.5% for a Gregorian-year entity saves a minute and creates a material error. Retain period start, period end, day count, effective regulation version and verification date, and let the workpaper display inputs rather than a black-box rate. In a Hijri-hawl example, a base of SAR 1,800,000.00 produces zakat of 45,000.00, but that example does not authorise copying the rate to a different year or fact pattern. Before close, the reviewer reopens the article, year and amendments and agrees them to the governed rate register.
A mixed route needs separation, not an invented blended rate. When ownership combines zakat and tax shares, document the ownership structure and effective date of every change, then determine how base, result and shared items are allocated under the approved treatment. Do not apply zakat to the whole base and then income tax to the whole profit, because that may duplicate exposure. Do not automatically split every account by ownership percentage when the law or item nature requires another treatment. The scope memo records assumption, authority and reviewers; the allocation register links each amount to entity total and route share. Where material ambiguity remains, obtain documented advice or an interpretative ruling rather than burying the question in a formula. The accountant's job is to make the judgement point visible and reviewable.
The teaching tool computes equity plus additions less deductions, but it does not decide whether an entered amount qualifies. Use it after preparing the classification register, then compare output with an independent bridge. Change one item per experiment: move a held asset into deductions after completing support, remove financing that fails the condition, or change the adjusted activity result. Write why the base changed rather than merely observing the figure. If output is 1,800,000.00, reperform it from 7,100,000.00 less 5,100,000.00 less 200,000.00. The reperformance exposes a reversed sign or an amount entered on two sides, and proves the learner understands the build instead of trusting the tool interface.
The close file combines scope memo, trial balance, account-to-base map, additions and deductions registers, activity-result adjustments, limits and rate calculation, journal and payment reconciliation. Every sheet carries preparer, reviewer, date and version; every exception carries owner and due date. Agreement with last year's base does not prove correctness: a new account may be unmapped or a disposed asset may remain deducted. Use year-on-year comparison to direct questions, then open populations and movement. Do not close merely because the total balances. Close when numbers return to books, treatments return to the effective text, and the effect of held items is explicit in the filing position.
A defensible result is neither the lowest possible number nor a conservative overstatement; it is the number that matches facts and rules. Explain to management the example's scope, assumptions, changes from prior year, unresolved items, cash effect and filing date. Record the decision without copying sensitive data into a training version, and retain evidence in restricted storage. The next lecture moves from the shape of the base to the hardest practical work: deciding whether financing or a provision is added, and whether an asset or investment is deducted, without treating account name as a substitute for regulatory conditions. A learner who masters scope and bridge can see the judgement point; one who jumps to the rate sees an output without a case.
Facts and supporting evidence
Approved zakat of 45,000.00 was paid from bank.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Zakat payable | 45,000.00 | |
| Bank | 45,000.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 45,000.00 | 45,000.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
Payment closes liability at the executed amount.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: Approved zakat of 45,000.00 was paid from bank. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Payer scope memo, Zakat base bridge explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the ownership structure, scope memo, accounts and effective regulation, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Zakat payable) and the credit side (Bank). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 45,000.00 and total credits 45,000.00. Debit detail: Zakat payable for 45,000.00. Credit detail: Bank for 45,000.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the base bridge, zakat and tax ledgers and item references. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: Bank and liability are understated by 5,000.00. Do not close until the journal agrees with the base, provision, return or assessment file and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.
Facts and supporting evidence
The book accrual was 40,000.00 and approved zakat became 45,000.00 before statements were issued.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Zakat expense | 5,000.00 | |
| Zakat payable | 5,000.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 5,000.00 | 5,000.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
Approval difference completes the liability only.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: The book accrual was 40,000.00 and approved zakat became 45,000.00 before statements were issued. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Payer scope memo, Zakat base bridge explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the ownership structure, scope memo, accounts and effective regulation, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Zakat expense) and the credit side (Zakat payable). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 5,000.00 and total credits 5,000.00. Debit detail: Zakat expense for 5,000.00. Credit detail: Zakat payable for 5,000.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the base bridge, zakat and tax ledgers and item references. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: Expense and liability are overstated 40,000.00. Do not close until the journal agrees with the base, provision, return or assessment file and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.
Facts and supporting evidence
Correct zakat of 45,000.00 was mistakenly credited to corporate income tax payable.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate income tax payable | 45,000.00 | |
| Zakat payable | 45,000.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 45,000.00 | 45,000.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
The liability is reclassified without repeating expense.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: Correct zakat of 45,000.00 was mistakenly credited to corporate income tax payable. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Payer scope memo, Zakat base bridge explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the ownership structure, scope memo, accounts and effective regulation, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Corporate income tax payable) and the credit side (Zakat payable). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 45,000.00 and total credits 45,000.00. Debit detail: Corporate income tax payable for 45,000.00. Credit detail: Zakat payable for 45,000.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the base bridge, zakat and tax ledgers and item references. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: Expense and total liabilities are overstated 45,000.00. Do not close until the journal agrees with the base, provision, return or assessment file and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.