E-invoicing: what changed in your daily work
An invoice is no longer a sheet you print but a structured document generated by a system and connected to the authority's platform. The practical effect on an accountant is larger than the name suggests.
Built forAn accountant who needs a concise treatment that can be applied and traced
When you need it
An invoice is no longer a sheet you print but a structured document generated by a system and connected to the authority's platform. The practical effect on an accountant is larger than the name suggests.
The decision it supports
Start with “Two phases, not one”, then use the explanation to choose the next treatment or check.
What you receive
Work note: E-invoicing: what changed in your daily work
A structured explanation, every official rate with source and review date, then a direct path to a lesson, tool or track.
An example you can inspect
Apply the decision: Two phases, not one
The first phase required invoices to be generated electronically in a structured format, ending acceptance of handwritten or scanned invoices. The second added integration with the authority's platform, rolled out in waves by revenue size.
Continue the workflow
- The VAT Accountant trackAvailable now
- Tool: splitting tax from an amountAvailable now
Two phases, not one
The first phase required invoices to be generated electronically in a structured format, ending acceptance of handwritten or scanned invoices. The second added integration with the authority's platform, rolled out in waves by revenue size.
An accountant does not need to build this, but does need to know their entity's wave and its integration status — because an invoice the platform did not accept is not a valid invoice, however correct it looks in your system.
The daily effect
Correcting an issued invoice is no longer an edit in a file but a credit or debit note linked to the original. Trying to "reissue" an invoice after it has been sent creates a duplicate that surfaces in the return.
Invoice sequence has become part of validity, so manual numbering or a gap in the sequence is now a question in a review rather than mere untidiness.