We are restoring the requested view from its saved state. Your account and work remain unchanged while you wait.
Back to the track — Financial Accountant
You receive locked TB-SEP-05. Account 120410 carries a 50,000.00 restricted supplier deposit while 210100 includes 50,000.00 owed to the same supplier; the preparer proposes showing zero. A 540,000.00 loan is wholly non-current although 90,000.00 falls due on 31/03/2027 and at 30/09/2026 there is no right to defer it beyond twelve months. An 8,000.00 employee advance sits in payroll expense, and a net customer advance of 12,000.00 sits in revenue although the service has not been performed; output VAT of 1,800.00 was correctly recognised when the gross 13,800.00 was collected. Correct both accounts, split the current loan portion, reject offsetting, then prove total assets of 3,323,500.00 equal liabilities and equity and every line returns to its map and note in SFP-SEP-05.
A statement of financial position is not a decorated trial balance but a translation of every account balance into an intelligible claim at the reporting date. Cash says the entity controls resources within a defined scope, receivables say it has rights against customers, inventory says economic benefits are under its control, and payables say obligations are owed to suppliers. Preparation begins from a locked trial balance carrying entity, ledger, currency, period and version, then maps every account to a line, presentation, note and measurement policy. Start from an unversioned copy and the statement may balance while missing the last entry. Put an unknown account in 'other assets' to make it disappear and arithmetic survives while meaning fails. Statement quality is the reader's ability to return from a presented line to the accounts, populations and evidence that produced it.
| Layer | Question | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Trial balance | What is the balance and normal side? | Account and version |
| Mapping | Which line and claim does it carry? | Line and note |
| Presentation | Current or non-current, gross or net? | Position and presented amount |
| Tie-out | Does every line return to accounts? | Zero difference and exception log |
Assets = liabilities + equity is a dual completeness control, not a correctness certificate. Every resource came from an obligation to another party, owners' funding or retained results, so both sides must agree. Yet a balanced error passes the equation: output VAT of 1,800.00 may be correctly recognised when a customer advance is collected while the net 12,000.00 is posted as revenue instead of a performance liability; an 8,000.00 employee advance may be posted as payroll expense instead of an asset, and netting may reduce an asset and liability equally. The statement still balances while liquidity, margin and obligations change. Preparation therefore uses two controls: recompute the equation, then tie each line to the account map and its substantiation. An equation difference stops issue immediately; a classification difference requires meaning review even when total agrees. The question is not only 'do the sides equal?' but 'does each side carry what its name claims it carries?'
The treatment starts from these documents. Follow the numbers to identify recognition date, amount, counterparty, reference and approval evidence before preparing the entry.
Facts and supporting evidence
Case one — an employee received an 8,000.00 advance to buy materials and has not yet settled it.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Employee advances — 120310 | 8,000.00 | |
| Cash at banks — 110100 | 8,000.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 8,000.00 | 8,000.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
Entity holds a recoverable right or receipts; it is a current asset until settlement.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: Case one — an employee received an 8,000.00 advance to buy materials and has not yet settled it. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Statement mapping sheet, Current classification and offset review explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the event source, cut-off memo and journal approval, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Employee advances — 120310) and the credit side (Cash at banks — 110100). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 8,000.00 and total credits 8,000.00. Debit detail: Employee advances — 120310 for 8,000.00. Credit detail: Cash at banks — 110100 for 8,000.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the general ledger, subledger and related reconciliation. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: Assets and profit fall 8,000.00 and an item needing follow-up disappears. Do not close until the journal agrees with the trial balance and financial-statement lines and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.
Version and approve the account-to-statement map with effective date. Do not allow a new account into final reporting without line, note and normal side; show unmapped as exception, not zero. Keep current classification and rationale separate from account name and tie current portions to maturity schedules. Record offset right, intent and evidence. After every late entry rerun map, statement, ratios and notes and withdraw the prior management-pack copy.
Use mapping sheet for accounts, lines, current status, notes and substantiation. Let statement sheet calculate totals, equation and working capital. Record loan and deposit in classification, then document gross presentation in offset review.
Work output: A workbook
These are yours once downloaded, and need no account. Fill them with your own figures and keep them in your portfolio.
Map employee advance and input VAT to current assets, customer advance to current liabilities and bank charges to finance costs. Leave one unmapped to see the exception, then fix it.
SFP-SEP-05 issue lab: you have a locked trial balance, four sensitive mappings, a loan and proposed offset. Do not issue until every decision closes.
What you haveFile has no trial-balance version.
The arithmetic in this case runs in the tool itself, which is open to you any time with your own figures.
Record entity, date, ledger, currency, trial-balance version and last entry. For each difference write account, balance, normal side, line, note, current status and decision evidence. For offset write asset, liability, counterparty, enforceable right, intent and conclusion. Do not close until totals return to version, unmapped is zero, equation balances and distributed version is proved.
This is not sent anywhere and not stored here. Write it down for yourself — in the workpaper you downloaded, or on paper.
The statement begins from a locked trial balance and map linking every account to line, note and evidence. Assets equalling liabilities and equity controls completeness but does not certify classification. Current status follows operating cycle, maturity and rights existing at reporting date, so current loan portions and cash restrictions are reviewed. Gross presentation is the rule; offset needs enforceable right and net or simultaneous settlement intent. Unmapped accounts remain visible exceptions, statement, ratios and notes rerun after every change, then the version is approved, distributed and predecessor withdrawn.
'How do you turn a locked trial balance into a statement of financial position, decide current portions and prevent improper offsetting?'
Answer every question. Getting them all right records this lesson; you may retry as often as you need.
Reading alone records nothing.
The complete applied walkthrough is available below while the recording is prepared.
A statement of financial position starts not from a template but locked TB-SEP-05. Every account lands on a line and note with evidence. Equation must return zero, but it cannot expose an employee advance expensed or customer advance booked as revenue. After mapping, test current status at 30 September: 90,000.00 of borrowing falls due within twelve months with no deferral right, becoming current without a new expense. Then test offset: a 50,000.00 supplier deposit and equal payable are not zero unless enforceable right and net or simultaneous intent exist. Present gross, tie every line, close unmapped exceptions and rerun notes and ratios. Only then issue SFP-SEP-05 and prove receipt.
Current or non-current classification describes when the entity expects to realise an asset or settle a liability within its operating cycle and rights existing at the reporting date. Cash, receivables and inventory are often current because their turnover belongs to operations, but the name is insufficient. A deposit restricted for three years is not current merely because it is cash, and the portion of a five-year loan due within twelve months does not remain wholly non-current. The preparer reads maturity, the entity's right to defer settlement, operating-cycle nature and restrictions on use, not a default system bucket. If a loan is renewed after the reporting date, the question is what right existed on that date, not what was agreed later. The classification file carries contract, maturity schedule, date, decision and reviewer because moving 90,000.00 between lines leaves total liabilities unchanged but alters working capital and the interpretation of near-term capacity.
Working capital equals current assets less current liabilities, but it is the result of classification, not a target permitting reclassification. If current assets are 1,480,000.00 and current liabilities 1,125,000.00, working capital is 355,000.00. Moving a 90,000.00 current loan portion into non-current raises it to 445,000.00 without adding one riyal of cash. The preparer therefore does not use the ratio to prove classification; contracts, ageing and cut-off establish classification, then the result is calculated. Nor is the figure read alone. Slow inventory of 600,000.00 may make working capital positive without funding payroll quickly, while customer advances may raise current liabilities although settlement requires service delivery rather than cash payment. The statement organises claim timing, and analysis adds item quality, conversion speed and the operating obligations behind the figure.
Offsetting hides scale and relationships. If the entity holds a 50,000.00 supplier deposit and owes the same supplier 50,000.00, presenting zero suggests no right or obligation although two events, contracts and timings exist. The same counterparty and equal amounts are insufficient. Net presentation requires an enforceable right of set-off and an intention to settle net or simultaneously under the applicable policy. Otherwise asset and liability are presented gross, with the relationship explained in notes if material. The same logic applies to restricted cash, overdrafts, tax and provisions: a cleaner number must not be manufactured by deleting information readers need. The offset review records both items, contracts, right, intention and reviewer conclusion. If either condition is incomplete, the result is 'gross presentation', not 'zero difference'.
| Question | If yes | If no |
|---|---|---|
| Is the right enforceable at reporting date? | Continue to intention | Present gross |
| Is net or simultaneous settlement intended? | Document net basis | Present gross |
| Does material information remain? | Disclose nature and risk | Retain tie-out |
After mapping, classification and presentation, the preparer builds the statement bottom-up and top-down. Bottom-up, approved account balances roll into each line with signs, counter-accounts and unmapped exceptions checked. Top-down, every visible line opens into components, note and substantiation. Line totals must agree to the linked trial-balance version, the equation must balance, and movement from comparative period must be explained through account activity rather than generic wording. An unmapped account remains an exception with name, balance and owner; it is neither spread proportionally nor buried elsewhere. After any adjustment, mapping, statement, ratios and notes are rerun. The final copy carries version, last-entry time, preparer, reviewer and distribution evidence because a correct statement that never reached its user—or an old copy remaining in the management pack—does not achieve reporting purpose.
The statement should not be prepared as final while the trial balance is unlocked, material accounts remain unsubstantiated, the account map changes without approval, or functional and presentation currencies are unresolved. Useful work then is to close the predecessor: fix the version, complete substantiation, approve mapping or resolve currency. A clearly marked draft may support review, but it is not distributed as final or used for a financing decision. Nor does the preparer post an entry merely to make the statement balance; the investigation returns to entry and source. Balance produced by a manufactured offset hides error in equity or a clearing account. The final professional decision before issue is simple and strict: can an independent reviewer trace every amount, understand its timing, see every exception and recompute the equation on the same version? If not, the statement is not finished.
Facts and supporting evidence
Case two — a VAT-registered entity collects 13,800.00 before providing a standard-rated service: net advance 12,000.00 and output VAT 1,800.00.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Cash at banks — 110100 | 13,800.00 | |
| Customer advances — 210420 | 12,000.00 | |
| VAT — output — 210600 | 1,800.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 13,800.00 | 13,800.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
Cash is an asset and the net advance is a current performance obligation until service. Output VAT is due when the advance is collected and never becomes revenue.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: Case two — a VAT-registered entity collects 13,800.00 before providing a standard-rated service: net advance 12,000.00 and output VAT 1,800.00. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Statement mapping sheet, Current classification and offset review explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the event source, cut-off memo and journal approval, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Cash at banks — 110100) and the credit side (Customer advances — 210420, VAT — output — 210600). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 13,800.00 and total credits 13,800.00. Debit detail: Cash at banks — 110100 for 13,800.00. Credit detail: Customer advances — 210420 for 12,000.00; VAT — output — 210600 for 1,800.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the general ledger, subledger and related reconciliation. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: Liabilities fall and profit rises 12,000.00 while service remains owed, and the balanced journal does not expose the error. Do not close until the journal agrees with the trial balance and financial-statement lines and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.
Facts and supporting evidence
Case three — 90,000.00 of a 540,000.00 loan is due within twelve months.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Non-current bank borrowing — 220100 | 90,000.00 | |
| Current portion of borrowing — 210510 | 90,000.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 90,000.00 | 90,000.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
Reclassification separates current maturity without changing total liability.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: Case three — 90,000.00 of a 540,000.00 loan is due within twelve months. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Statement mapping sheet, Current classification and offset review explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the event source, cut-off memo and journal approval, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Non-current bank borrowing — 220100) and the credit side (Current portion of borrowing — 210510). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 90,000.00 and total credits 90,000.00. Debit detail: Non-current bank borrowing — 220100 for 90,000.00. Credit detail: Current portion of borrowing — 210510 for 90,000.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the general ledger, subledger and related reconciliation. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: Profit and equity fall 90,000.00 while non-current borrowing stays overstated. Do not close until the journal agrees with the trial balance and financial-statement lines and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.
Facts and supporting evidence
Case four — an earlier entry offset a 50,000.00 supplier deposit against payables without enforceable right.
Correct treatment and entry
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier deposit — 120410 | 50,000.00 | |
| Trade payables — 210100 | 50,000.00 | |
| Total (SAR) | 50,000.00 | 50,000.00 |
Treatment and financial effect
Reversing offset restores gross asset and liability with their evidence.
Reperformance starts from this case's own facts: Case four — an earlier entry offset a 50,000.00 supplier deposit against payables without enforceable right. Obtain the original source that proves this event. The training drawings Statement mapping sheet, Current classification and offset review explain field shape and reading order; they do not replace the case document or transfer their figures into it. Match entity, period, currency, reference and version to the event source, cut-off memo and journal approval, then confirm that the source supports the debit side (Supplier deposit — 120410) and the credit side (Trade payables — 210100). Missing ownership, date, reference or approval remains an open exception; a balancing journal or undocumented assumption does not cure it.
Remeasure from the facts before reading the proposed journal, then add it independently: total debits 50,000.00 and total credits 50,000.00. Debit detail: Supplier deposit — 120410 for 50,000.00. Credit detail: Trade payables — 210100 for 50,000.00. Link every line to the recognition or measurement rule explained in the lecture, then trace its reference and posting date. After posting, test the general ledger, subledger and related reconciliation. Equal sides prove arithmetic only, not the correct account, period or classification.
Before close, compare the correct treatment with the common alternative and record its specific effect: Assets and liabilities fall 50,000.00 and the scale of two claims disappears. Do not close until the journal agrees with the trial balance and financial-statement lines and an independent reviewer can move from balance to account, reference and this event's own source. Keep the calculation, source version, journal identifier, reconciliation result and unresolved exceptions in the same workpaper. An attached file without a stated conclusion is not review evidence.